A syntagonistic relation is antinomic to an antagonistic relation. Antagonism is conflictory, syntagonism is
what is compatible and mutually constructive. Slavery is syntagonistic, for it begets a lasting truce between
men in the eternal pursuit of power, instead of the relation being conflictory, the inter-cooperative existence
of master and slave is complimentary. A mutually recognized proper allocation of power, control, and the
actualization of shared interests. The slave lacks the foresight, restraint, contemplative postulations, and
pursuits of the master, the master oftentimes lacks the brawn, is in need of another for work allocation and
without he is quantitatively disadvantaged. Thus the master forms a foundation for the slave and the slave,
through instruction, builds upon the foundation of the master. Ownership in man entails the responsibility of
man to support man, Government is, partially, founded upon this premise. We should not have a distribution
of societal rule and interest for its own sake, or for the sake of enabling the individual conceptions of chance,
upon circumstance, upon interest, instead we should have relations in order to construct and ensure the
existence of a prolonged collective virtuous existence. The conception of man to this end should not be
limited to selfish whims, instead it should be for altruistic, beneviolent ends. We should view society, and
Mankind more broadly, as the foundation for the manifestation of righteousness and as such we should use
our time to cultivate this righteousness to the furthest degree possible. This can be exclusively accomplished
through the model of inter-connected necessity. The necessity of the continuation of the individual man is
his motivation to contribute, this contribution is malleable and societally dependent, it is dependent upon
the collective will of the regional interest, aswell as those who govern and their strictures or lack thereof.
Slavery is the additive to guarantee complimentary, productive relations. It is the filter by which the entrusted
sovereign directors understand and give direction to the subordinate mass, and thereby mitigate the antagonistic,
deconstructive, and degenerative in order to maximize the contructive,syntagonistc, and virtuous.
The fundamental premises behind the ideal of societal syntagonism is that the expression of complimentary
relations is conducive to virtuous civilization, that the, oftentimes, antagonistic relations that develop within
free society are degenerative to the propriety of man, and that the hierarchy manifested through slavery is
the purest expression of syntagonistic pursuits. Where there are two syntagonistic relations and those relations
invariably or expressly entail hostility the conforming syntagonistic relation should take priority and preference
over the a-conforming relation. The non-productive should be mitigated, altered, or eliminated. The ideal of
a syntagonistic society dictates that the a-moral should be subordinate to the moral, this converts an antagonistic
relation into a syntagonistic relation. The sovereignty of the one should mandate this collective alliance of
interest and action. To not have both short and long term interests align with action entails inevitable conflict.
This conflict should be mitigated through an inter-dependent set of relations. These relations should encompass
the economic and the social, while being informed by the prospective. Free society not only enables the
antagnostic but welcomes this mode of being. For what is freedom if not a great, and or total, litany of
choice, and what is this open-ended, personalized choice if not dormant conflict? The parts that make
up society should not be principally occupied by the degeneracy minded fiends, the selfish, financially
led manipulators, and a apathetic mass with all the inculcated perverse conceptons the other facets
provide, instead civilization should be led by the wise and propriety minded. In order to facilitate this
leadership society needs a stable foundation. Any leader will be strongly impeded if not completely
obstructed from exercising proper authority in times of mass unrest, conflict, or general moral decay.
A heathy effective leadership is most often manifested through a healthy civilization. The one should
be upon upon and ensure the contiuation of the other.
The compatibility of the religious facet of society should be complimentary to the governmental, the
governmental should be complimentary to the social, and the social should be complimentary to the
economic. The aggregate of civilization, without guidance partake in a life of gregarious banality, to
expect much more is delusion, however there is a question as to the ramifications of said general
existence and that question relates to the particulars of acceptability and action. Normalcy is not
static and when exclusively led by the whims of their fellow man or the intrinsic social peculiarities
of free society mankind become glutenous, deviant, and incredulous towards the easily accessible
and observable self-destructive tendencies encapsulated by this carnal pursuit of self interest. It is
imperative that they be governed and not just just governed by the state but through a systematic
and private control. Where the state is insufficient slavery must reside, contemplate the ramifications
of near total freedom on any other collection of beings. What is the result, is it orderly and desirous?
No, man is only different in degrees and aesthetics. The results of freedom for man is a self mandated
lessening of character, ability, and expectency of societally constructive reward. The only aspect that
tempers this state of being and ensures it is not often found universally objectionable, beyond the apathy
and tolerance of the masses of mankind is the tendency for self-subordination. Free society perverts
this tendency but it is still present and thereby the free man stumbles blindly into constructive relations.
Slavery should be the tie that binds all of these different sections of civilizational existence. Free society
ensures a conflict of interests and the mentality of personalization.. To be personally minded is to prioritize
ones’ individual existence above the whole and the whims and greater ideals of the whole. A healthy
body thrives not just through immediate preference but moreso and with greater longevity through a
rigid pre-concieved program of betterment, society is comparable. We must subordinate our individual
selves, our economic interests, and our personal relations in order to lay the foundation for a syntagonistic
society, to not consecrate ourselves to this goal is to ensure moral and racial all encompassing, inevitable,
and rapid extinction.